非常感谢亦凡图书馆的编者们以网络形式
给读者奉献出如此宝贵的了解中国现代革
命史的精神食粮！我对你们的辛勤劳动致
以敬意！
The tourble is:
To Chinese people, it turned out
that both sides were BAD guys!!!!!
Huge sacrifice ended up with
NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
蒋介石的国防部第三厅(作战厅)厅长郭
树槐是共产党的间谍。东北战场，淮海
战场的作战计划，国军将领都还没收到，
毛泽东的桌子上就有一份了，这战还能打
胜吗？
每场战争都会有真相，多个“真相”，那一
个能解释历史的发展，解释正反两种力量的
搏杀，那一个就是最接近真实的“真相”。
敌对势力，即便失败了，也不会放弃利用书
写历史进行对抗的企图。比如，读者评论中
就不乏此类企图。所以，不只应看看有没有
新鲜的事实，更要看看有没有正确的历史
观。
东北作家张正隆写了一本《雪红血白》，书
中采访了不少东野老战士。但是，张在反复
叹息国军精锐部队被歼灭，叹息长春老百姓
饿死，却不反省是谁造成精锐被歼，是谁对
老百姓饿死负主要责任。此文一出，很受海
外反共笔杆子们的青睐，频频被引用。然
而，可笑的是，反共笔杆子们似乎都没经历
起码的西方教育，连一篇文章应该引用至少
三种不同的来源这一起码的要求都达不到。
更可笑的是，张对共军精锐部队只字不提，
似乎是靠运气打仗。如果，有一天，张作家
要写一篇东野主力入朝参战的小说时，将怎
样解释美军的失败？美国人要比反共笔杆子
们坦诚直率，将黄继光，胡绩修，邱少云收
入西点教材，目为“超人”。美国空军前参
谋长加布里艾尔上将，当着王海的面承认，
“我是被你打下来的。”试问，张与反共笔
杆子们有这样还原历史真相的勇气吗？
I have to acknowledge that
Huang Buotao is a hero.
But those KMT generals could
only fight hard in the last
minute of their lives.
What a pity!
To FLJ:
It is funny that you say the
contents is from Zhang's novel.
There is nothing that is a bit like
that novel.
Zhang's novel talks about Northeast
China. However, is this novel about
Northeast ONLY?
Besides, Zhang's novel always lack
an overview of the whole country,
but spent a lot time retelling old
stories from old men of NorthEast
Army. How can both novels be like
each other?
Zhang's novel lacks a historical
view of who is the driving force of
the history, but keep yowing it is
a pity that KMT's strong armies be
destroyed. Compared to this novel,
is there a single paragraph that
express the same point of view?
You say that this novel steals
something from Zhang's novel, tell
me where?
FLJ, have you ever read any other
novel about Liberation War? such as
Liu Becheng's book, Su Yu's book,
and many other marshalls and
generals' books?
Most of contents are stolen from
Mr Zhang ZhenLong's "Red Blood
White Snow" or "XueHongXueBei
-flj
The author uses Mao's name rather
than "Chairman" Mao. This is
something should be done by any
historic books.
This is much better than Volume 3.
I learned some details I never
knew before. Thanks!
比上卷好多了。其码是在续事，不想上卷
是胡扯的评书。
大家来竞猜一下，这第四卷和前三卷比又
如何？
我个人认为无论如何也比第三要好些（写
第三的一定是个50-60岁的老弱智，哈哈,
得罪罗），但是我觉得可能还比不上第
一、二，一般的传记都是，虎头蛇尾